I’m not alone in wondering how, a month into a new Labour government, the country is in utter chaos. Riots, two-tiered policing where armed mobs roaming the streets get treated differently according to their etnicity and/or religious affiliations, calls to ban X for daring to allow videos of Muslims attacking a pub in Birmingham while people get arrested in their homes for posting on Facebook. We’ve even got government officials calling for the banning of the EDL, which was disbanded over a decade ago. Has Keir Starmer’s government completely lost the plot? Is this government as incompetent as it currently appears? Personally, I don’t think so. We are now way beyond the stage where ineptitude, cowardice or appeasement can be blamed for the ongoing civil disorder on our streets and the government’s response to it. Surely it would require a level of incompetence and idiocy that would have precluded Starmer’s Labour from ever getting into power in the first place? And what is this continued reference to Islamophobia all about? Is Starmer an Islamist? That is a ridiculous assumption for any but the most jaded conspiracy theorist. There is only one possibility left I can think of. I think Labour are doing exactly what they set out to do. This eruption of a long-festering social malaise was expected, perhaps even encouraged, and is now being managed.
It started with the horrific murder of three young girls in Southport, but that was merely the catalyst. Fourteen years of an inept Tory government who oversaw lockdown, BLM and the total capture of our institutions by the new religion of postmodern Marxism left patriots and libertarians, Christians and nationalists wondering why their entire culture, history and achievements were being rubbished by ignorant and/or faithful adherents of the new postmodern religion of social justice. Tragically, misinformation as to the Southport killer’s identity quickly led to mob behaviour, violence and the start of what is proving to be the worst social discontent seen in Britain since the miner’s strike. The patriotic working classes, the people who feel pride in their country, those who value their heritage and history, all have been demonised for some time now. WW1 was kicked off by a seemingly insignificant assassination, in world terms. I’m not belittling the tragic death of those 3 girls in Southport, I’m just saying that there are many ways to light a primed powder keg. The two-tiered policing we see going on on our streets, as police arrest white people for thought crimes, waving British flags or preaching from the Bible while armed Muslim youths swarm through our cities and towns unchallenged, makes me reluctantly conclude that the current chaos gripping Britain was not just expected, but planned for, long before the Tories imploded and Labour won the election. We need to face the fact that Keir Starmer is probably not the inept, flip-flopping wet fish he led us to believe. He is a ruthless and ambitious man with a plan, who is now imposing his globalist neo-Marxist vision on our country. The toolmaker’s son hasn’t lost control of the country, as so many are claiming, he has gained control and is now consolidating his power. It’s all going exactly as planned, albeit perhaps slightly ahead of schedule.
Keir Starmer really has played a blinder. Right up until the election, he maintained the appearance of being a bit dim and easily swayed. The only person who saw the danger was Peter Hitchens, and I like many others did not take him seriously. You only have to watch Starmer on television now talking about ‘right-wing thugs’ to realise that peter Hitchens was correct. Starmer knew that the Tories had messed things up so badly that it was extremely unlikely that he would not win the election. A captured media and an army of useful idiots signed up to the new religion of woke Marxism would do the rest. Prior to gaining power, he could afford to hide his real intentions behind a facade of being rather inept and dull. He lulled us into a false sense of security- we all thought he’d make such a mess of government that he’d probably not manage to stay in power for a full term. In fact, he’s planning on making it almost impossible to get rid of him. His choice of Angela Raynor as deputy is not the stupid mistake many think. She poses no threat to his absolute rule. He has surrounded himself with ideologues and idiots who will not question either his motives or his methods.
What everyone seems to be forgetting is that Starmer is a barrister. Not only that, he was Director of Public Prosecutions. He has detailed knowledge of criminal law, human rights law and immigration law. He has worked in all three. He knows more about the legal system in Britain as it is implemented, enforced or changed better than any Prime Minister in modern times, possibly in history. He is going to use the law to turn Britain into an authoritarian neo-Marxist state, with himself as dictator. I expect we are going to see radical changes in the law, perhaps eventually even a State of Emergency which will enable him to get draconian new laws passed that will never be repealed. Laws on ID, financial privacy, medical autonomy. This revolution is going to be the first in history to be implemented by the legal system of the country it is taking over. It is an incredibly audacious plan.
Starmer has however chosen a very dangerous strategy in playing the Islamists. Taking advantage of the bizarre inclusion of Muslims as an oppressed minority on the postmodern matrix of intersectionality, he has decided to use them against his own people. This is why he is allocating £24m for security for mosques while completely ignoring the groups of militant Muslim youths on our streets. Starmer knows he has the useful idiots of the new religion of identity politics on his side. He knows he can count on the mainstream media and social media (with the exception of X) to keep the reality of armed Muslim youths away from TV and ‘phone screens. And it’s effective. Today my brother called me a crazed right-wing conspiracy theorist and claimed that any videos of Muslim gangs were no doubt staged productions by EDL members in blackface. The same EDL that was disbanded in 2011 that the government is now harping on about. And my brother is normally a sceptic. We truly are living in a time of heavily manipulated false realities.
Years of woke infiltration of police forces across the land, a compromised judicial system Starmer understands well and a civil service that the Tories allowed to be taken over by ideologues mean that he has no effective opposition within government. And now he is using Muslims in his ongoing program of the demonisation of the only force that could topple him- conservative Britons. His immediate goal seems to be to discredit and disenfranchise his most dangerous opposition, the predominantly white, patriotic British public, and he is taking advantage of their rage about immigration, grooming gangs and crime while at the same time manipulating the establishment’s long-standing fear of acknowledging, let alone confronting, the danger radical Islam poses to our way of life.
What I had difficulty working out is how Starmer plans to put the genie of militant Islam back in it’s broken bottle. Modern history is littered with failed treaties between socialists and Islamists. The Islamists always come out on top. Surely, if he’s smart enough to instigate a revolution by law, he’s smart enough to know that he’s made a pact with a group who may one day prove to be the greatest threat against him? Perhaps, just as communists are always telling us that communism just hasn’t been done right yet, he thinks he has a foolproof plan to remove the teeth from Islam in Britain once he has established his authoritarian dictatorship. There was always going to be a reckoning at some point. The incompatibility of Islam with the pronouned alphabet army will inevitably erupt into conflict at some point.
Is Starmer’s plan to give Muslims enough rope to hang themselves? Let them think they have carte-blanche to do as they please, with his £24m for security for their mosques, by continuing to not mention the Muslim gangs roaming the streets and his incessant bleating about ‘Islamophobia’? As the radical Muslims become more emboldened, the government can blame any violent incidents that do attract the attention of the media or the Labour faithful on a ‘small minority of radicals’. Trot out a few moderate imams to condemn the violence. As it gets worse, target individual mosques known to harbour radical imams. Then when they start committing serious acts of violence and/or terrorism, which is inevitable, stamp down hard on them while saying how disappointed the government is in the Muslim community after all the support they’ve been given. Why did they choose to to create civil disorder when the government was on their side?
It would be relatively easy to turn the woke against Islam by subtly highlighting the homophobia and misogyny embedded in Islam, bring up the grooming gangs, start talking about the dangers of ‘irregular migration’. Finally, when a full-scale Muslim uprising erupts, invoke martial law and send in the army, who will be far more willing to fight Islamists on the streets of Britain than square up against the native British public. This scenario is the only method with which the toolmaker’s son can possibly entertain any hope of controlling and eradicating an ambitious Islamic opposition emboldened by the establishment’s long-standing fear of confronting it. It would be extremely bloody and violent, and necessarily Stalinesque in it’s execution if it is to succeed.
The only question now is how far is Starmer prepared to go? Does he actually understand Islam enough to realise how much of a threat it actually is? Islam is a far more robust ideology than Marxism, as history has proven. Postmodern Marxism is even weaker than it’s progenitor, relying as it does on such esoteric concepts as ‘lived experience’ and imagined identities. Islam will still be around long after the last pronoun has been shed. Whatever happens next, it is not going to be pretty.
Or we can just optimistically continue to assume that Keir Starmer is, in fact, a bumbling socialist fool who won’t survive the next round of by-elections. I don’t think recent events allow anyone that luxury.